0

From FullyInformed.com, we have this interesting piece today:

Put selling remains my favorite investment strategy. Over the past 4 decades, put selling has evolved into a very profitable means of compounding my capital, annually. When I started put selling in the mid 1970′s there were only a handful of stocks that had options available. Premiums were a lot higher in the mid 1970′s and over the years as more and more stocks had options introduced, option premiums have decreased except during periods of high volatility.

But with the maturing of the options market, there are today so many more stocks with options available and good option volumes on most, that it more than makes up for the decreased premiums through the wide variety of stocks available to select from.

The author here brings up a good point. Option volume is very important. Essentially, the more people there are trading a particular option, the close the bid and the ask quotes will be. The fewer people trading an option, the farther apart the quotes will be. We always want to go with the more liquid positions. The slippage (the extra amount you end up paying due to the bid-ask spread) on illiquid options can be enormous. This is critical if you want to exit your position through buying back the option. If the spread is large, you won’t be able to buy it back for less than you got in premium when you originally sold it.

A lot of readers email me with questions about my put selling strategy of trying to earn 1% a month or 12% annually. While most weeks I receive just one or two such emails, when the market is trending higher I receive a lot more. This is because as stock markets move higher it becomes more difficult to engage in put sellingout of the money puts and still earn at least 1% a month.

If you read the article “My Strategy Explained” you’ll understand that I aim for about 1% a month in income. My goal is 12% of my entire stock portfolio a year of consistent income. But it is important to remember that some months it may be difficult on certain stocks to receive 1% in a month. The goal though is 12% annually and a year is a long time. There will be periods when earning 1% is difficult but there will also be lots of periods when I can earn more than 1% in a month. This is the trade-off when investing through put selling.

Put Selling And The 12% Goal

I have a lot of investor friends. Many make more than 1% a month and many more than 12% a year. But not every year and not every month. Often what to them seemed like a great trade turned out to be a poor trade and ends with a loss. It only takes a few losses to wipe out months of gains. It only takes one bad year to wipe out years of gains.

The 12% return is my goal in put selling because I have found through every single market, bull and bear I can consistently earn 12% and continue to compound my capital.

12% annual earnings on a $100,000 portfolio compounds to over $300,000 in just 10 years. In 20 years it will compound to over 1 million dollars. 12 percent is a terrific return if it can be done consistently while controlling risk.

Just to be clear here, the author is talking about a 12% return on his entire portfolio, not on a per-trade basis. I doubt very much that 100% of his capital is in selling puts for income. If it is, then he would need to be doing so in a cash secured strategy or with bull put spreads.

Put Selling Is About Managing Risk

It is the 12% goal I care about with put selling. While it’s nice to earn 2% or more in a month when put selling, I know that overall the goal is 12% annually. That is what it will take to grow my capital according to my plan while managing risk. Not just risk of assignment, but risk of being assigned at overvalued prices which increases the likelihood of owning stock for long periods of time. If to earn 2% or more in a month I have to assume a higher risk of assignment it is necessary to be sure the stock is not overvalued.

Buy having monthly as well as an annual goal I can concentrate on either. When, as in the last two years, I reach my goal of 12% with months left in the year, I can pull back from riskier trades and sell for even half a percent because I have already reached by goal of 12%. Having clear objectives when put selling or trading stocks, controls emotion and the risk of stepping into a bad trade.

While I understand what he is saying here, I think it is even more important to focus on the particular trade at hand. How a trade effects the returns of your overall portfolio is nice to know, but never lose focus on the stock that the trade is on! If selling a put on a particular stock for income yields you 1%, great. If it yields you 2%, great. If it yields you anything, great. The key is to make sure you come out ahead like you planned in the first place!

Netflix Stock Put Selling Losses

Netflix stock is just one of many put selling disaster examples. Earlier this year Netflix stock traded over $200 and by July it had hit an intraday high of $300.70. It was highly overvalued and had a book value of just $7.40 and was trading at 68 X its PE. In less than two months it had fallen to below $130.00. I started receiving emails in early September from put selling investors caught in the collapse of Netflix. By the end of September I had received more than 1250 emails from put selling investors who had sold puts at strikes between $275.00 and $175.00. Many had been assigned shares which they did not want and many could not afford. One poor reader had 10 contracts assigned at $270.00 but the stock was trading at $155.00. 10 puts at $270.00 is $270,000.00 of capital.

Netflix was a stock heavily promoted by analysts and talked about endlessly on business media outlets. This is typical of analysts as they basically talk about the “stock of the month” like it was a new ice cream flavor brought to market. These talking heads know nothing about fundamentals, PE, book value and balance sheets let alone earnings projection. They know nothing about true value in a stock and certainly nothing about putselling. They are filling airtime.

Look at the Netflix Stock Put Option chart below for Jan 30 2012. Today three investors emailed to tell me that they had bought to close Jan 2013 $200 and $215 puts for staggering losses. They told me they had given up on Netflix Stock and were closing their put trades for huge losses. These are puts that were sold for $18.00 and $19.00 dollars of income when they sold the puts.  Such losses can sometimes take a lifetime to recover.

Put Selling against NetFlix Stock has led to enormous losses for many investorsPut Selling against NetFlix Stock has led to enormous losses for many investors

So why did these investors get caught? Because Netflix Stock was terribly overvalued and had been for over a year. But the constant chatter about the rise in Netflix Stock by Analysts and the lure of the enormous put premiums drew them into what became an emotion charged put selling trade. They forgot to manage risk.

At the very least as Netflix Stock rose, they might have considered a credit spread strategy of selling the higher put and buying a protective put. While they would still have had large losses, a credit spread would have assisted in limiting those losses.

Netflix Stock begs the question why would anyone put selling this stock?Netflix stock chart begs the question why would anyone choose put selling for this stock?

The Netflix stock chart above asks the question about why anyone would consider Netflix stock for put sellingat such lofty levels? It was typical investor exuberance that pushed this stock to such lofty levels. But with so many stocks to choose from for put selling, why choose Netflix? With exceptionally high put premiums, it drew a lot of investors into put selling. Those high put premiums were a sure sign from the market that Netflix stock was overvalued and could easily fall.

Well, yes and no. It is true that you, as an investor who is selling puts for income, must be aware of reversals in trend, “overvaluation” is entirely subjective. As the popular saying goes, the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent. So NFLX was overvalued for a year? Entirely possible. But it kept going high and kept making put sellers lots of money, myself included.

You must watch out for changes in trend though. NFLX was an excellent candidate for selling puts for income all through 2010. At each trough in its cycle, it provided very strong support and yielded high premiums. So far, so good. The sophisticated put seller will know to never sell puts during a period when earnings reports are released. Earnings reports have the ability to drastically move the market, and we have seen that here. Once NFLX released a report that resulted in a downward break of its trendline, NFLX was no longer a candidate for put selling.

Nobody should have lost money selling puts on NFLX. It was only stupidly aggressive traders who did. If you follow Selling Puts for Income, you know that we analyze the chart each and every time we look to enter a trade. The stock must have a strong chart to even consider selling puts.

Put Selling Is Not Free Money

Put selling is for too many investors considered free money. It is not. It is not even close. The risk when selling puts is enormous and it does not matter which stock the put selling strategy has been applied to.

Put selling against overvalued stock is a disaster waiting to happen. Investors can do well for a while selling against overvalued stocks, but in most cases when the stock turns, it moves lower so quickly that the investor has no time to buy to close for small losses. Sometimes within a day or two the loss to close the sold puts can be huge.

True, but why would you be waiting for 2 days to close a losing position?

Risk Is Risk When It Comes To Put Selling

Put selling is incredibly risky for those who do not want to own the underlying stock. It is even riskier for those who fail to do any analysis of the underlying stock but simply look at the put premiums to select the fattest premium for put selling.

With proper management and stock selection, put selling is not risky. There is risk, yes, but risk and risky are two different things.

With my strategy I have a list of large cap dividend paying stocks that I like for put selling. They each have long histories of recovering from market meltdowns. When they become overvalued I move away and look at other stocks within my stock list.  Should they fall and I cannot roll down or out, I would own them and begin selling covered calls. As well should the stock fall further than expected I have cash always available to either pick up shares at fire sale prices OR sell puts at lower strikes which moves my average cost of held shares even lower.

Certainly an option (hah!), but I don’t think there is any need to restrict your selection of stocks to dividend paying companies only. As I’m sure we are all aware, dividends represent a minority of stock positions. Is that 2-5% per year worthwhile if you are going to end up selling covered calls anyways and making much more? In my book, the added flexibility that comes from examining the entire marketplace of weekly options is worth much more than the dividends that I might get if I get assigned a stock from a losing trade.

I keep 30% of my entire portfolio in cash to take advantage of pullbacks and crashes. With a stock market crash I only need to commit the cash part of my portfolio once every so many years to make huge gains which can then be averaged out for those years when my cash sits idle waiting for stock market sales.

That seems reasonable.

Put Selling Is Not A Race And It Is Not Gambling

My goal explained in my strategy is attainable and can be consistent if applied properly. Put selling is not a race and it certainly is not gambling. I do not believe that any option seller can consistently earn 12% a year in and out while controlling risk without having in place a solid put selling strategy and being highly selective in the stocks they sell options against.

So while many investors aim for that 2% or more every month I am content to establish a goal of 12% a year for my entire portfolio and wait for the opportunities to come to me.

Fair enough. Despite the technical points of contention I raise above, I fundamentally agree with this author about using the strategy of selling puts to create income. I focus much more on maximizing each individual trade rather than the overall portfolio. To me, if each trade is as good as I can make it, then the effects on the portfolio will take care of themselves. In addition, I exclusively sell weekly options in order to reduce the risk from extreme changes  in a stock. It reduces my per-trade return, but it increases my success level and averages out to higher returns over time.

Filed under Commentary by on . Comment#

0

Weekly options are options on various stocks and indices that expire every week. In principle, they work exactly the same as monthly options, but there are some differences in the way they trade that the smart put seller needs to be aware of. So in this article, I’m going to go over:

  • what weekly options are
  • how they work
  • how they are the same as monthly options
  • how they are different from monthly options
  • which securities you can trade weekly options on
  • and why they are excellent choices for selling puts.
I assume throughout this article that you are familiar with basic option concepts like puts, calls, expiration dates, and strike prices.

Weekly Option Basics

What are weekly options?

Weekly options are simply options that expire at the end of each week. On most brokerage platforms, you’ll something that says an expiration date with a “w” on the end or “wk 2″ or something similar. See the picture below for an example using the stock MSFT. Read more on Weekly Options Bible – Everything You Need to Know…

Filed under Advanced Options by on . Comment#

0

Another interesting article comes to us from Seeking Alpha regarding the use of selling puts to effectively create a dividend:

Investors who suffered a “lost decade” in U.S. equities as measured by the S&P500 (SPY) are flocking to dividend paying equities. Dividends have accounted for over 40% of the total annual return of the S&P 500 since 1926, and more than 100% of the returns over the past 10 years. Investors concerned about a “bubble” in dividend stocks can create dividend-like cash flow from equities that do not pay dividends.

True! Which just goes to show what a sucker’s move buying and holding is. A much easier way to get dividends is to just buy right before the ex-dividend date and then sell the stock for no gain. That way you at least aren’t tying up your capital forever.

Regardless, the investing masses aren’t aware of any of this, but they do know that getting paid to hold stock is often better than not getting paid to hold stock. So they love the 5% per year dividend payers.

Savvy investors can create a “synthetic dividend” themselves with selling puts on cash rich companies that do not pay dividends. Investors can generate 10% annual yields by selling cash secured at-the-money puts on low levered, cash-rich, high-growth equities.

Yes, this is true. However, if you are selling at the money puts and you’re only getting 10%, you are probably doing something wrong. If you are selling out of the money puts in a very conservative manner, 10% is more realistic.

Investors should seeking companies with strong balance sheets meanings low debt and excess cash on their balance sheets. As these once technology, high flyers could start making quarterly dividend distributions to shareholders as cash builds on the balance sheet.

Solid advice. Companies with lots of cash have less downward probability because either value investors will come in and buy or the company itself will buy back shares. This decreases the chances that you will get caught out in the cold with your short put.

And then the author goes on to show some fundamentals from eBay (EBAY), MasterCard (MA), Amazon.com (AMZN), Apple Computer (AAPL), and Visa (V). These are all good companies that hold lots of cash on their balance sheets. This makes them excellent candidates for selling puts.

But remember that you must assess the chart formations before entering a position!

Filed under Commentary by on . Comment#

0

CNN writer Philip Elmer-DeWitt shares this little gem with us:

According to Terry Gregory, who keeps track of such things at AAPLInvestors.net, Apple (AAPL) was set to register its 8th highest close of all time — $408.25 — Wednesday before the selling started. By 4 p.m., it had fallen to $402.64 a share, its 19th highest close.

Naturally this disappointed many AAPL bulls, of which there are many. But it gets better.

Subscribers to the theory of maximum pain — which holds that stocks whose options are traded on a weekly basis tend to close each Friday at a price that rewards institutions selling puts and calls and penalizes investors buying them — will note that in Wednesday’s action, Apple’s share price fell $5.61 closer to max pain, which currently stands at $400.

Now this is interesting. Basically what he is saying is that many people that large financial institutions, like the proprietary trading desks at Goldman Sachs, manipulate the market to take money from retail buyers of stocks and options each expiration.

I have news for you: they do.

Think about it. If you are a multi-billion dollar company with huge resources and access to markets, have large positions that are important to your firm, AND have the power to move the market your way, would you use that power and move the market? There are two kinds of answers here: those who will and those who think/say they won’t, but will anyways.

So yes, Virginia, there is market manipulation. And this begs the question, which side should you be on? Should you be buying the options that are getting hammered to “maximum pain” or should be selling options on the side of those who are moving the markets?

I’ll give you a minute to think about it.

No, really…

OK, got it? If you said selling options (and puts especially), you get a gold star and some gold in your pocket! Here’s the deal, the vast majority of options expire worthless. Those who are buying these options are hoping for a home-run. This is basically gambling. If you are a really good gambler and know what to place your bets on, you can do very well. But most gamblers just lose money to the house.

Be the house! Sell puts to generate small, consistent, easy profits on rising stocks. Instead of the home run, get on base with a single or a double over and over and over again. I promise it’s not nearly as hard as making it to the major leagues.

Filed under Commentary by on . Comment#

0

From MoneyShow.com, we get this little nugget:

Economic growth in 2012 will be minimal in the United States, non-existent in Europe, and slowing in China from the looks of current data. However, one place we see a big potential for growth is Brazil, whose underlying fundamentals are among the world’s strongest.

Brazil’s rapidly emerging middle class is the engine driving growth in the country. The labor market has been exceptionally strong in Brazil, with the unemployment rate at 5.8% and falling.

Fair enough. Personally I think we are in for a surprisingly good 2012, but even if I’m wrong, Brazil is one of the best up-and-coming economies in the world. No argument there.

Another catalyst for growth is the rapidly approaching 2014 World Cup and 2016 Olympics. These events have prompted major government investments in infrastructure. Increased investment in airports, the power grid, railways, roads, hotels, and telecommunications will all have a long-term impact on Brazilian growth—all of which should transcend their current direct impact.

Mmm… crony capitalism and fat government contracts. Just what Dr. Institutional Investor ordered!

OK, enough back story, let’s get to the meat…

o capitalize on this growth, we recommend selling the March 50 put on the iSharesMSCI Brazil Index Fund (EWZ). This ETF provides exposure to Brazilian equities without any exchange rate risk.

The March 50 put is trading with a 41% implied volatility, meaning there is a significant premium to be collected by selling the option. By being short the put, we are collecting cash upfront and waiting for this ETF to dip before buying.

Now here’s a bit of sense that I don’t often see in articles about selling puts! Yes, you want volatility to be high and to be selling puts on dips. The higher the volatility, the more premium you get when you sell (and the more buyers pay when they buy). Always keep this in mind: low volatility means buy, high volatility means sell. Selling puts on a dip is the proper way to execute this trade.

If EWZ closes below $50, which is near the 52-week low of $49.25, we get to buy the ETF at an exceptional value. If EWZ is not trading below $50 at March expiration, the premium collected is yours to keep and is a way to get paid to wait for the perfect entry into this fund.

Now the numbers, despite their apparent clarity, get murky. Because if you follow both my and the author’s recommendation and sell on a dip, these prices will be very different the day you enter the trade. So take these as guidelines only.

Also realize that this is a somewhat different trade from what we usually discuss here at Selling Puts for Income. In our standard trade, we want the put to expire worthless, collect our cash, and move on. Here the author is talking about using this as an entry into a long position because he is bullish on Brazil.

Selling puts to enter long positions is a very traditional strategy, and it makes a lot of sense if you are a buy and hold investor. Why wouldn’t you want to get a discount off the buying price? Still, I generally think buy and hold is for suckers. Let’s say he’s right and Brazil is a fabulous play for 2012. What are we looking at returns-wise? 10%? 15%? 20%? Well we know that in 2010-2011 the ETF ranged between 50 and 65, so if history rhymes we’re looking in the 20% area. That’s not bad. But what if you sold a put every month and got 1.6% each time? Wouldn’t that also be 20% without the risk of holding the ETF and tying up your capital?

Seems like it would be to me…

 

Filed under Commentary by on . Comment#

0

Seeking Alpha is out with a trading idea involving puts on a treasury ETF:

For the fixed income investor, one possibility would be to consider selling puts on the iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund (TLT). The mere suggestion of such a possibility is likely maddening to many investors, as Treasuries remain one of the investments retail investors, analysts, and many fund managers seem to love to openly mock, even as prices keep going higher and higher.

True, but with short term yields closing in on 0%, how much higher can they go? Yes, the yield curve could flatten out more, but the upside of such a trade is definitely limited.

Perhaps this will finally be the year the Treasury bears can make a little bit back on the massive losses they’ve accumulated while trying to short an uptrend (in prices) and fight the Fed. Read more on Commentary: Selling Puts – A Passive Investment Strategy For 2012…

Filed under Commentary by on . Comment#

0

Another noteworthy post from optionMonster:

One investor wants to make money from ING without owning the shares or paying a penny.

optionMONSTER’s monitoring programs detected the sale of more than 4,000 December 8 puts on the Dutch financial conglomerate for $0.40. Volume was almost 4 times open interest in the strike.

This put selling is a bet that ING will hold its ground or push higher in the next two weeks. If that proves right, the trader will keep the premium while the puts expire worthless. Even if the bet is wrong, the income generated will cushion the blow of being forced to buy shares, lowering the entry price to $7.60.

The transaction is noteworthy because it occurs at the point in the expiration cycle when options lose value most quickly. (See Chris McKhann’s recent discussion of how selling puts can be an effective and safe strategy despite appearing risky.)

ING rose 4.46 percent to $7.96 on Friday, failing to hold its earlier highs above $8. The stock has followed the trajectory of most other European financials, which bounced hard last week as policy-makers rushed to avert debt contagion.

About 2,000 December 8 calls were also sold against open interest, which suggests that investors used the snap-back to exit bullish positions.

Overall options volume was 7 times greater than average in the name.

I think someone out there is reading Selling Puts for Income! This is exactly the strategy I detail here on this site.

ING gapped up today, and this put seller is correctly viewing this as a bullish sign. The stock would have to drop 10% over the next 4 days in order for him to have any losses.

Always, always, always sell puts with as little time to expiration as possible. We want the time-value to erode quickly.

This trade is also noteworthy simply from the size.  Like the article says, this was 4 times the open interest. The open interest is the number of contracts that have been written to date. In this case, all the put sellers in all the world had sold about 1000 contracts. Then this seller comes in and sells 4000 of them, corresponding to 400,000 shares. At $0.40 a piece, that’s a premium of $160,000!

This is the power of Selling Puts for Income. Get $160k in your pocket up front, then wait for expiration – and make that wait as short as possible.

Filed under Commentary by on . Comment#

0

I came across this little gem on nasdaq.com:

Chelsea Therapeutics has been milling sideways for most of the year, but news about the drug developer is starting to get interesting.

On Nov. 17, the Food and Drug Administration approved the company’s request to conduct a priority review of Chelsea’s Northera drug, used to treat dizzy spells. The company also made a presentation at Piper Jaffray’s 23rd Annual Healthcare Conference on Wednesday.

CHTP has climbed in the last three sessions on strong volume, potentially suggesting activity by large investors. The stock rose another 4.42 percent yesterday to close at $5.43.

optionMONSTER’s tracking programs detected the sale of more than 2,000 January 5 puts, most of which priced for $0.60, against open interest of a single contract in the strike. If CHTP remains above $5 through expiration, the puts will expire worthless and the investor will get to keep the premium.
Read more on Commentary – Volatility seller sets sights on Chelsea…

Filed under Commentary by on . Comment#

0

One thing I don’t mention enough is that it isn’t just stocks that have options. Commodities, futures, and currencies also have options! Today’s commentary is on selling put options in the oil market.

From http://www.dailymarkets.com/economy/2011/11/30/risk-premium-returning-to-crude-oil-prices/ we have:

With less than three weeks to expiration and good chart support near the 95.00 area basis the January Crude futures, some aggressive traders may perhaps wish to explore selling puts in January Crude options with strike prices below support at 95.00. For example, with the January futures trading at 99.53 as of this writing, the Jan 90.00 puts could be sold for about 0.52, or $520 per option, not including commissions. The premium received would be the maximum potential gain on the trade, which would be realized at option expiration in mid-December should the January futures be trading above 90.00.

Here’s a perfect example. With today’s announcement by central banks across the world of coordinated intervention, the dollar is getting crushed. A down dollar means upward pressure on everything priced in dollars – including oil. This trader is selling puts $10 (10%) under the current market for oil. I think this is an excellent trade as oil prices are likely to boom higher along with everything else.

Continuing from the article:

Heightening political tensions in Iran have become a focal point on many traders’ radar screens, with the potential of economic sanctions including a ban on imports from one of the world’s leading Oil exporters appearing to have supported Crude Oil futures prices.

In addition to the normal market dynamics from the dollar action, we also have price support with tensions in Iran. Iran is a major exporter and any interruption of that supply will only further push oil prices.

China has come out and said that they will support Iran if anything does end up happening. In my opinion (expert of course!) that means that there will not be any war with Iran, no matter what posturing we might see in the near term. However, prices could still rise significantly on perceived tensions over the matter.

The majority doesn’t have to be right in order to move markets. The thin volume that we’ve seen recently can provide for dramatic moves from what would normally be small trades.

Filed under Uncategorized by on . Comment#