Another interesting article comes to us from Seeking Alpha regarding the use of selling puts to effectively create a dividend:
Investors who suffered a “lost decade” in U.S. equities as measured by the S&P500 (SPY) are flocking to dividend paying equities. Dividends have accounted for over 40% of the total annual return of the S&P 500 since 1926, and more than 100% of the returns over the past 10 years. Investors concerned about a “bubble” in dividend stocks can create dividend-like cash flow from equities that do not pay dividends.
True! Which just goes to show what a sucker’s move buying and holding is. A much easier way to get dividends is to just buy right before the ex-dividend date and then sell the stock for no gain. That way you at least aren’t tying up your capital forever.
Regardless, the investing masses aren’t aware of any of this, but they do know that getting paid to hold stock is often better than not getting paid to hold stock. So they love the 5% per year dividend payers.
Savvy investors can create a “synthetic dividend” themselves with selling puts on cash rich companies that do not pay dividends. Investors can generate 10% annual yields by selling cash secured at-the-money puts on low levered, cash-rich, high-growth equities.
Yes, this is true. However, if you are selling at the money puts and you’re only getting 10%, you are probably doing something wrong. If you are selling out of the money puts in a very conservative manner, 10% is more realistic.
Investors should seeking companies with strong balance sheets meanings low debt and excess cash on their balance sheets. As these once technology, high flyers could start making quarterly dividend distributions to shareholders as cash builds on the balance sheet.
Solid advice. Companies with lots of cash have less downward probability because either value investors will come in and buy or the company itself will buy back shares. This decreases the chances that you will get caught out in the cold with your short put.
And then the author goes on to show some fundamentals from eBay (EBAY), MasterCard (MA), Amazon.com (AMZN), Apple Computer (AAPL), and Visa (V). These are all good companies that hold lots of cash on their balance sheets. This makes them excellent candidates for selling puts.
But remember that you must assess the chart formations before entering a position!
Filed under Commentary by on Jan 25th, 2012. Comment.
Another noteworthy post from optionMonster:
One investor wants to make money from ING without owning the shares or paying a penny.
optionMONSTER’s monitoring programs detected the sale of more than 4,000 December 8 puts on the Dutch financial conglomerate for $0.40. Volume was almost 4 times open interest in the strike.
This put selling is a bet that ING will hold its ground or push higher in the next two weeks. If that proves right, the trader will keep the premium while the puts expire worthless. Even if the bet is wrong, the income generated will cushion the blow of being forced to buy shares, lowering the entry price to $7.60.
The transaction is noteworthy because it occurs at the point in the expiration cycle when options lose value most quickly. (See Chris McKhann’s recent discussion of how selling puts can be an effective and safe strategy despite appearing risky.)
ING rose 4.46 percent to $7.96 on Friday, failing to hold its earlier highs above $8. The stock has followed the trajectory of most other European financials, which bounced hard last week as policy-makers rushed to avert debt contagion.
About 2,000 December 8 calls were also sold against open interest, which suggests that investors used the snap-back to exit bullish positions.
Overall options volume was 7 times greater than average in the name.
I think someone out there is reading Selling Puts for Income! This is exactly the strategy I detail here on this site.
ING gapped up today, and this put seller is correctly viewing this as a bullish sign. The stock would have to drop 10% over the next 4 days in order for him to have any losses.
Always, always, always sell puts with as little time to expiration as possible. We want the time-value to erode quickly.
This trade is also noteworthy simply from the size. Like the article says, this was 4 times the open interest. The open interest is the number of contracts that have been written to date. In this case, all the put sellers in all the world had sold about 1000 contracts. Then this seller comes in and sells 4000 of them, corresponding to 400,000 shares. At $0.40 a piece, that’s a premium of $160,000!
This is the power of Selling Puts for Income. Get $160k in your pocket up front, then wait for expiration – and make that wait as short as possible.
Filed under Commentary by on Dec 6th, 2011. Comment.
I came across this little gem on nasdaq.com:
Chelsea Therapeutics has been milling sideways for most of the year, but news about the drug developer is starting to get interesting.
On Nov. 17, the Food and Drug Administration approved the company’s request to conduct a priority review of Chelsea’s Northera drug, used to treat dizzy spells. The company also made a presentation at Piper Jaffray’s 23rd Annual Healthcare Conference on Wednesday.
CHTP has climbed in the last three sessions on strong volume, potentially suggesting activity by large investors. The stock rose another 4.42 percent yesterday to close at $5.43.
optionMONSTER’s tracking programs detected the sale of more than 2,000 January 5 puts, most of which priced for $0.60, against open interest of a single contract in the strike. If CHTP remains above $5 through expiration, the puts will expire worthless and the investor will get to keep the premium.
Read more on Commentary – Volatility seller sets sights on Chelsea…
Filed under Commentary by on Dec 4th, 2011. Comment.
One thing I don’t mention enough is that it isn’t just stocks that have options. Commodities, futures, and currencies also have options! Today’s commentary is on selling put options in the oil market.
From http://www.dailymarkets.com/economy/2011/11/30/risk-premium-returning-to-crude-oil-prices/ we have:
With less than three weeks to expiration and good chart support near the 95.00 area basis the January Crude futures, some aggressive traders may perhaps wish to explore selling puts in January Crude options with strike prices below support at 95.00. For example, with the January futures trading at 99.53 as of this writing, the Jan 90.00 puts could be sold for about 0.52, or $520 per option, not including commissions. The premium received would be the maximum potential gain on the trade, which would be realized at option expiration in mid-December should the January futures be trading above 90.00.
Here’s a perfect example. With today’s announcement by central banks across the world of coordinated intervention, the dollar is getting crushed. A down dollar means upward pressure on everything priced in dollars – including oil. This trader is selling puts $10 (10%) under the current market for oil. I think this is an excellent trade as oil prices are likely to boom higher along with everything else.
Continuing from the article:
Heightening political tensions in Iran have become a focal point on many traders’ radar screens, with the potential of economic sanctions including a ban on imports from one of the world’s leading Oil exporters appearing to have supported Crude Oil futures prices.
In addition to the normal market dynamics from the dollar action, we also have price support with tensions in Iran. Iran is a major exporter and any interruption of that supply will only further push oil prices.
China has come out and said that they will support Iran if anything does end up happening. In my opinion (expert of course!) that means that there will not be any war with Iran, no matter what posturing we might see in the near term. However, prices could still rise significantly on perceived tensions over the matter.
The majority doesn’t have to be right in order to move markets. The thin volume that we’ve seen recently can provide for dramatic moves from what would normally be small trades.
Filed under Uncategorized by on Nov 30th, 2011. Comment.
Selling Puts – Risk vs Risky and Overall Performance
From FullyInformed.com, we have this interesting piece today:
The author here brings up a good point. Option volume is very important. Essentially, the more people there are trading a particular option, the close the bid and the ask quotes will be. The fewer people trading an option, the farther apart the quotes will be. We always want to go with the more liquid positions. The slippage (the extra amount you end up paying due to the bid-ask spread) on illiquid options can be enormous. This is critical if you want to exit your position through buying back the option. If the spread is large, you won’t be able to buy it back for less than you got in premium when you originally sold it.
Just to be clear here, the author is talking about a 12% return on his entire portfolio, not on a per-trade basis. I doubt very much that 100% of his capital is in selling puts for income. If it is, then he would need to be doing so in a cash secured strategy or with bull put spreads.
While I understand what he is saying here, I think it is even more important to focus on the particular trade at hand. How a trade effects the returns of your overall portfolio is nice to know, but never lose focus on the stock that the trade is on! If selling a put on a particular stock for income yields you 1%, great. If it yields you 2%, great. If it yields you anything, great. The key is to make sure you come out ahead like you planned in the first place!
Well, yes and no. It is true that you, as an investor who is selling puts for income, must be aware of reversals in trend, “overvaluation” is entirely subjective. As the popular saying goes, the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent. So NFLX was overvalued for a year? Entirely possible. But it kept going high and kept making put sellers lots of money, myself included.
You must watch out for changes in trend though. NFLX was an excellent candidate for selling puts for income all through 2010. At each trough in its cycle, it provided very strong support and yielded high premiums. So far, so good. The sophisticated put seller will know to never sell puts during a period when earnings reports are released. Earnings reports have the ability to drastically move the market, and we have seen that here. Once NFLX released a report that resulted in a downward break of its trendline, NFLX was no longer a candidate for put selling.
Nobody should have lost money selling puts on NFLX. It was only stupidly aggressive traders who did. If you follow Selling Puts for Income, you know that we analyze the chart each and every time we look to enter a trade. The stock must have a strong chart to even consider selling puts.
True, but why would you be waiting for 2 days to close a losing position?
With proper management and stock selection, put selling is not risky. There is risk, yes, but risk and risky are two different things.
Certainly an option (hah!), but I don’t think there is any need to restrict your selection of stocks to dividend paying companies only. As I’m sure we are all aware, dividends represent a minority of stock positions. Is that 2-5% per year worthwhile if you are going to end up selling covered calls anyways and making much more? In my book, the added flexibility that comes from examining the entire marketplace of weekly options is worth much more than the dividends that I might get if I get assigned a stock from a losing trade.
That seems reasonable.
Fair enough. Despite the technical points of contention I raise above, I fundamentally agree with this author about using the strategy of selling puts to create income. I focus much more on maximizing each individual trade rather than the overall portfolio. To me, if each trade is as good as I can make it, then the effects on the portfolio will take care of themselves. In addition, I exclusively sell weekly options in order to reduce the risk from extreme changes in a stock. It reduces my per-trade return, but it increases my success level and averages out to higher returns over time.
Tags: commentary, examples, puts, returns, risk, volatility, weekly, why.
Filed under Commentary by Neal on Feb 7th, 2012. Comment.